General

Aaron Z. Zandman, Respondent, v. Kullman Dining Car Co., Inc., Appellant; Anna Kirchmeier, Defendant

256 A.D. 946·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1939·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Aaron Z. Zandman, Respondent, v. Kullman Dining Car Co., Inc., Appellant; Anna Kirchmeier, Defendant. [MAJORITY] Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, with ten dollars costs. The denial is on the merits and on the further ground that the application to the Appellate Term for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division was not timely. Present — Lazansky, P. J„ Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.