General
Excel WARREN v. STATE of Arkansas
328 Ark. 222942 S.W.2d 259·Arkansas Supreme Court·1997·AR
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Excel WARREN v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 97-166
942 S.W.2d 259
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered April 21, 1997
Zimmery Crutcher, for appellant.
No response.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
On March 12, 1997, we issued a per curiam instructing counsel for appellant, Zimmery Crutcher, to file within thirty days a motion and affidavit accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the notice of appeal in this cause. That thirty-day period has elapsed, and counsel has filed no response, motion, or affidavit.
Appellant’s attorney, Mr. Crutcher, is directed to appear before this court at 9:00 a.m., Monday, May 5, 1997, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for failure to perfect the appeal in this case.