Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
Walter LADAGE, Plaintiff in Error, v. GARLAND STEAMSHIP CORPORATION and Kawasaki Dockyard Company, Limited, Defendants in Error
9 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Walter LADAGE, Plaintiff in Error, v. GARLAND STEAMSHIP CORPORATION and Kawasaki Dockyard Company, Limited, Defendants in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 15, 1926.)
No. 146.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Silas B. Axtell, of New York City (Charles A. Ellis, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Hunt, Hill & Betts, of New York City (Geo. Whitefield Betts, Jr., and H. Victor Crawford, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error Kawasaki Dockyard Co.
Barry, Wainwright, Thacher & Symmers, of New York City (Stewart McDonald and Dallas S. Townsend, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error Garland Steamship Corporation.
. Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PEE CUEIAM.]
PEE CUEIAM.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.