Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
386 U.S. 348·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 947.
Decided March 20, 1967.
Harry C. Ames, Jr., T. Randolph Buck, Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.
Nuel D. Belnap and'Richard J. Hardy for Waterways Freight Bureau, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.