Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Robert ANDREU, etc., et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
3 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert ANDREU, etc., et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 4, 1925.)
No. 4290.
In error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida; Henry D. Clayton, Judge.
R. E. Stillman, of Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiffs in error.
Harry W. Reinstine, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Jacksonville, Fla. (Wm. M. Gober, U. S. Atty., of Tampa, Fla., and Maynard Ramsey, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Jacksonville, Fla., on the brief), for the United States.
Before WALKER and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs in error were convicted of a conspiracy to possess, transport, and sell intoxicating liquor, in violation of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 192S, § 10138Ai et seq.). Their only defense was that they were entrapped by government agents. The evidence was in conflict on this issue, and no objection or exception was made or taken to any ruling or charge of the court. The judgment is affirmed.