Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Association for the Preservation of Freedom of Choice, Inc., et al. v. Nation Company
375 U.S. 899·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Goldberg are of the opinion that the motion should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 12, 1963.
No. —.
Association for the Preservation of Freedom of Choice, Inc., et al. v. Nation Company.
Alfred Avins on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
The motion of Association for the Preservation of Freedom of Choice, Inc., for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Goldberg are of the opinion that the motion should be granted.