General

UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Francis M. DARRAGH, Appellee

63 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1933

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Francis M. DARRAGH, Appellee. No. 4967. Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Feb. 20, 1933. Louis E. Graham, U. S. Atty., and W. J. Aiken, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., and C. L. Dawson and Davis G. Arnold, both of Washington, D. C. William Kaufman, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee. Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. In this veterans’ insurance case, recovery was had against the government, and the sole question before us on the latter’s appeal is whether the court erred in refusing to give binding instructions in favor of the defendant. As no principle, practice, or precedent is involved, we limit ourselves to stating the evidence was such that the court committed no error in so refusing. The judgment below is therefore affirmed.