General
In the Matter of the Application of L. Walter Stephens and Maude Marie Stephens to Compel Maurice B. Gladstone, Attorney, to Account and Pay Over Monies Collected by Him as Attorney at Law, and for Other Relief as Contained Herein. Maude Marie Stephens v. L. Walter Stephens. (Action No. 1.); Maude Marie Stephens v. L. Walter Stephens and Others. (Action No. 2.)
258 A.D. 866·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1939·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of L. Walter Stephens and Maude Marie Stephens to Compel Maurice B. Gladstone, Attorney, to Account and Pay Over Monies Collected by Him as Attorney at Law, and for Other Relief as Contained Herein. Maude Marie Stephens v. L. Walter Stephens. (Action No. 1.) Maude Marie Stephens v. L. Walter Stephens and Others. (Action No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
— Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for a reargument and for a stay denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.