General
Gehrig, Hoban and Co., Inc. v. United States
49 Cust. Ct. 338·United States Customs Court·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(Reap. Dec. 10278)
Entry No. 706793.
Gehrig, Hoban and Co., Inc. v. United States
(Decided June 25, 1962)
Says, Bushy anú, Rivlcin for tlie plaintiff.
Joseph D. Q-uilfoyle, Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — OliveR, Chief Judge:]
OliveR, Chief Judge:
The above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision on stipulation of counsel for the parties, on the basis of which I find that cost of production, as defined in section 402a(f), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the perfumes involved and that such values are the appraised unit values, less 2.041 per centum, plus the cost of packing at $5 per case.
Judgment will issue accordingly.