Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Chester R. BOWEN, Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES TRUST & SAFE DEPOSIT CO. et al. Appellees
75 F.2d 1006·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Chester R. BOWEN, Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES TRUST & SAFE DEPOSIT CO. et al. Appellees.
No. 7738.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 21, 1935.
Lloyd S. Nix, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Stoner & Gardner and George Gardner, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Before WILBUR and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM]
PER CURIAM
Upon consideration of stipulation of counsel for respective Parties and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal allowed by District Court, and petition for allowance of appeal by this court dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issued forthwith.