Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Administrative
Albert ROSETTI, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caspar WEINBERGER, Secretary, Health, Education & Welfare, Defendant-Appellee
525 F.2d 986·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1975
Before WEICK, PECK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Albert ROSETTI, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caspar WEINBERGER, Secretary, Health, Education & Welfare, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 75-1893.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 1975.
Irwin W. Barkan, Barkan, Barkan & Neff, David Dachner, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.
William W. Milligan, U. S. Atty., Thomas D. Thompson, Columbus, Ohio, Robert J. Kielty, Asst. U. S. Atty, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant-appellee.
[MAJORITY]
ORDER
Before WEICK, PECK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.
This appeal, perfected from an order of the district court affirming the defendant-appellee’s denial of social security disability benefits, has been submitted on the record on appeal and on the briefs and oral arguments of the parties. It is concluded that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the appellee’s finding that appellant is possessed of the residual physical capacity to perform light work and his finding that such light work is available in the local and natiorial economy, and therefore,
It is ordered that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.