Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Lucie E. Everdell et al., Appellants, v. Elizabeth Hill et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of Mary L. Everdell, Deceased, et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others
170 N.Y. 581·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lucie E. Everdell et al., Appellants, v. Elizabeth Hill et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of Mary L. Everdell, Deceased, et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
Everdell v. Hill, 58 App. Div. 151, appeal dismissed.
(Argued March 3, 1902;
decided March 4, 1902.)
■ Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 6,1901, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial.
Jacob S. Van Wyck for appellants.
Jacob F. Miller and Gyrus G. Miller for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Vann. Cullen and Werner, JJ.