General
Rosenberg et al. v. United States
345 U.S. 1003·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 687.
Rosenberg et al. v. United States,
[MAJORITY]
ante, p. 965. Petition for rehearing denied. Mr. Justice Frankfurter deems it appropriate to state once more that the reasons that preclude publication by the Court, as a general practice, of votes on petition for certiorari guide him in all cases, so that it has been his “unbroken practice not to note dissent from the Court’s disposition of petitions for certiorari.” Chemical Bank Co. v. Investors, 343 U. S. 982; Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc., 338 U. S. 912; Darr v. Burford, 339 U. S. 200, 227; Agoston v. Pennsylvania, 340 U. S. 844; Bondholders, Inc. v. Powell, 342 U. S. 921; Rosenberg v. United States, 344 U. S. 889, 345 U. S. 965. Partial disclosure of votes on successive stages of a certiorari proceeding does not present an accurate picture of what took place. Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion the petition for rehearing should be granted.