Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
Van Dyke et al. v. Wisconsin Tax Commission et al.; and First Wisconsin Trust Co., Trustee, v. Same
311 U.S. 605·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 265.
No. 266.
Van Dyke et al. v. Wisconsin Tax Commission et al.; and First Wisconsin Trust Co., Trustee, v. Same.
October 14, 1940.
Messrs. Douglass Van Dyke and George D. Van Dyke' for appellants. Messrs. John E. Martin, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Harold H. Persons, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted, and the judgments are affirmed. Pearson v. McGrow, 308 U. S. 313.
Reported below: 235 Wis. 128; 292 N. W. 313.