Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Rothschild FRANCIS, Appellant, v. George Washington WILLIAMS, Judge, etc., Appellee
21 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rothschild FRANCIS, Appellant, v. George Washington WILLIAMS, Judge, etc., Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
December 13, 1926.
No. 3489.
See, also, 11 F.(2d) 860.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the motion on behalf of appellee to dismiss this appeal and the rule thereon upon appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed, returnable the first Monday of December, 1926, and the ease being called on that day, to wit, Monday, December 6, 1926, and there being no appearance on behalf of appellant, it is ordered that the appeal in the above-entitled cause be and the same is hereby dismissed.