General
Andrew W. MELLON, Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENT. R. CO., Michigan Central Railroad Company, Vermont Central Railway, et al., Appellees
11 F.2d 335·United States District Court for the District of Columbia·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Andrew W. MELLON, Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENT. R. CO., Michigan Central Railroad Company, Vermont Central Railway, et al., Appellees.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted December 10, 1925.
Decided February 1, 1926.)
No. 4297.
Peyton Gordon, V. E. West, and J. P. Crawford, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
J. C. Adkins and J. I. Peyser, both of Washington, D. C., for appellees.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
Certiorari denied 46 S. Ct. 630, 70 L. Ed. —.
[MAJORITY — VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.]
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
The appeal in this ease is by the Secretary of the Treasury against the intervening railway companies. The opinion rendered this day in Mellon v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. R. Co. (No. 4273) 11 F.(2d) 332, App. D. C., is decisive of all the matters presented by this appeal. It is unnecessary, therefore, to enter into any discussion of the law or facts applicable to this ease. A decree should be entered therein, following the decree in the Original case.
The decree is reversed, with costs.