Corporations
Joseph Campagna, Appellant, v. Ralph Sabatini, Defendant; Kasrose Development Corporation, a Domestic Corporation, and the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation, Authorized to Transact Business in New York State, Respondents
233 A.D. 855·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1931·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph Campagna, Appellant, v. Ralph Sabatini, Defendant; Kasrose Development Corporation, a Domestic Corporation, and the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation, Authorized to Transact Business in New York State, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment dismissing complaint reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the objections made to the notice of lien are without merit. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.