Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Robinson and Watson, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. W. J. Wingate, County Judge of Orange County, Tex., et al.
198 U.S. 580·Supreme Court of the United States·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 513.
Robinson and Watson, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. W. J. Wingate, County Judge of Orange County, Tex., et al.
In error to the Court of Civil Appeals of the First Supreme Judicial District of the State of Texas.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted April 17, 1905.
Decided April 24, 1905.
Mr. Thomas H. Clark for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Rebel Lee Robertson for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Oxley Stave Company v. Butler County, 166 U. S. 648; Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78. Case below, 80 S. W. Rep. 1067; 83 S. W. Rep. 182.