General
H. A. Caesar & Co. v. United States
3 Cust. Ct. 566·United States Customs Court·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
H. A. Caesar & Co. v. United States
No. 4641.
Invoice dated Lyon, France, December 28, 1936.
Entered at New York January 9, 1937.
Entry No. 800623.
(Decided September 15, 1939)
Strauss & Hedges (Howard C. Carter of counsel) for the plaintiffs.
Welster J. Oliver, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attorney), for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Tilson, Judge:]
Tilson, Judge:
According to the record in this case the merchandise the proper dutiable value of which is involved consists of silk tulle and silk illusions, which according to an agreement of counsel are similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in the case of Caesar v. United States, Reap. Dec. 4119.
Accepting the stipulation upon which this case has been submitted as a statement of fact, I find the proper basis of appraisement to be the export value, and that the proper dutiable export values of said merchandise are the values set out in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof.
To the extent specifically indicated the appeal is sustained; in all other respects and as to all other merchandise the appraised values' are affirmed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Schedule A