Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Interstate Commerce Commission et al. v. James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc. et al.
342 U.S. 951·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 579.
Interstate Commerce Commission et al. v. James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc. et al.
Daniel W. Knowlton, H. L. Underwood, Hewitt Biaett, Martin A. Meyer, Jr., H. Merle Mulloy, John R. Wall and J. P. Fishwick for the Interstate Commerce Commission et al.; and Bernard Sóbol for the Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. et. al., appellants.
Parker McCollester for the James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc. et al.; and Robert W. Knox, for Wyatt, Inc. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Mechling, 330 U. S. 567.