General
MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK v. ALLEN
97 F. 985·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1899
Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and HAWLEY, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK v. ALLEN.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 2, 1899.)
No. 519.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United Slates for the Northern Division of the District of Washington.
Edward Lyman Short, John B. Allen, aud R. C. Strudwiek (Struve, Allen. Hughes & McMickcn and Strudwiek & Peters, of counsel), for plain-riff in error.
Allen & Allen, for defendant in error.
Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and HAWLEY, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — HAWLEY, District Judge.]
HAWLEY, District Judge.
This is an action brought upon two policies of insurance on the life of Samuel B. Stewart:, each for the sum of $2,500. One premium was paid on each policy when delivered. No other premiums were ever paid. The pleadings in this ease, as to forfeiture, are similar to the case of Insurance Co. v. Sears (C. C. A.) 97 Fed. 986. The court sustained a demurrer to the answer, and rendered judgment in favor of defendant in ereor for $5,091, with interest and costs. Upon the legal principles announced in Insurance Co. v. Hill, Id. 263, and authorities there cited, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.