Torts · MBE-tested
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Henry Beckenstein
30 Conn. App. 923·Connecticut Appellate Court·1993·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Henry Beckenstein
(11246)
Foti, Heiman and Schaller, Js.
Argued February 18 —
decision released March 16, 1993
William P. O’Brien, for the appellant (defendant).
Gregg D. Adler, with whom, on the brief, was Mary E. Kelly, for the appellee (intervening plaintiff Karen Miller).
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The defendant appealed from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, awarding the plaintiffs $50,000 in damages for injuries and losses caused by the defendant’s negligence. After thorough review of the record, transcripts and briefs and affording those claims before us the appropriate scope of review, we find the defendant’s claims to be without merit.
The judgment is affirmed.