Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
H. Hollis Hunnewell, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edward W. Presho et al., Street Commissioners, etc.
190 U.S. 561·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 294.
H. Hollis Hunnewell, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edward W. Presho et al., Street Commissioners, etc.
In error to the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Massachusetts.
May 18, 1903.
Mr. Felix Rackemann for plaintiff in error.
Mr, Thomas M. Babson for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs per stipulation.