Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Maloney; and Maloney v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.
383 U.S. 948·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 977.
No. 1093,
Mise.
E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Maloney; and Maloney v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.
William H. Allen for petitioner in No. 977 and for respondent in No. 1093, Mise. Henry Lincoln Johnson, Jr., for petitioner in No. 1093, Mise.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Reported below: 122 U. S. App. D. C. 268, 352 P. 2d 936.