Contracts · MBE-tested
Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement Commission et al.; and American Oil Co. et al. v. Environmental Improvement Commission et al.
414 U.S. 1035·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these appeals.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 73-382.
No. 73-383.
Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement Commission et al.; and American Oil Co. et al. v. Environmental Improvement Commission et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Stewart would dismiss appeals for want of properly presented federal question.
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these appeals.
Reported below: 307 A. 2d 1.