General
Dayco Corp. v. United States, protest 66/76176 (New York)
59 Cust. Ct. 880·United States Customs Court·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. P67/287.
Dayco Corp. v. United States, protest 66/76176 (New York).
[MAJORITY — Watson, J.]
Watson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of panels, sheets, and bars, made from and advanced beyond the stage of synthetic resin or resin-like products into finished panels, sheets, and bars of specific sizes and shapes dedicated to specific uses, similar to manufactures of india rubber, other, and following Hensel, Bruckmann Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 212, C.D. 2498), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.