Admiralty
CULLEN v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.
279 F. 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1922
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CULLEN v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 28, 1922.)
No. 166.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit in admiralty by James H. Oullen against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Decree for respondent, arid libelant appeals.
Affirmed.
Maeklin, Brown, Purdy & Van Wyck and Pierre M. Brown, all of New York Oity, for appellant. Buriinghain, Veedor, Hasten & Fearey, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and Ralph W. Brown, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.