Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Territory of Oklahoma upon the Relation of Ridings, County Attorney, v. Neville et al., Board of County Commissioners
181 U.S. 615·Supreme Court of the United States·1901
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 272.
Territory of Oklahoma upon the Relation of Ridings, County Attorney, v. Neville et al., Board of County Commissioners.
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma.
Submitted April 24, 1901.
Decided April 29, 1901.
Mr. John W. Shartel and Mr. J. É. Keaton for the appellant. Mr. Horace Speed for the appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for-the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Smith v. Adams, 130 U. S. 167; Thomas v. Wooldridge, 23 Wall. 283, 288.