Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Auguste Dorn, Administratrix of Laura Schemanska, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Town of Oyster Bay, Respondent
158 N.Y. 731·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Auguste Dorn, Administratrix of Laura Schemanska, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Town of Oyster Bay, Respondent.
(Submitted March 14, 1899;
decided April 18, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 21, 1895, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Circuit, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Dorn v. Town of Oyster Bay, 84 Hun, 510, affirmed.
Paul E. De Fere for appellant.
F. II. Van Veehten for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.