Contracts · MBE-tested
THOMAS et al. v. CHARLES BAKER & CO., Inc.
60 F.2d 1057·United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
THOMAS et al. v. CHARLES BAKER & CO., Inc.
No. 6697.
District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.
July 25, 1932.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and Wolf, • Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohon, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.
Byron, Longbottom, Pape & O’Brien, of Philadelphia, Pa., for National Surety Co.
[MAJORITY — KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.]
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
And now, to wit, this 25th day of July, 1932, upon reading and consideration of the within report of T. MeKeen Ohidsey, Esquire, special master in the above ease, no exceptions thereto having been filed, the same is hereby approved. Distribution may bo made in accordance with the schedule made part of the master’s report.