Contracts · MBE-tested
Emich Motors Corp. et al. v. General Motors Corp. et al.
340 U.S. 945·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision of this question.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 209.
Emich Motors Corp. et al. v. General Motors Corp. et al.
[MAJORITY]
It is ordered that the concluding paragraph of the opinion of this Court in this case be amended to read as follows: “The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to modify its judgment to conform with this opinion.” It is further ordered that the judgment of this Court entered on February 26, 1951, be amended accordingly.
Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision of this question.
[The opinion is reported as amended, ante, p. 558, the change being at p. 572.]