General
In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Mandamus by Samuel Leow, Respondent, v. John T. Fetherston, as Commissioner of the Department of Street Cleaning of the City of New York, Appellant
165 A.D. 955·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1914·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Mandamus by Samuel Leow, Respondent, v. John T. Fetherston, as Commissioner of the Department of Street Cleaning of the City of New York, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered on the 26th day of August, 1914, granting a motion for an alternative writ of mandamus.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for an alternative writ of mandamus denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that there is no issue presented by the papers herein calling for the granting of any writ. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.