General
Daniel F. Young, Inc. v. United States
19 Cust. Ct. 213·United States Customs Court·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel F. Young, Inc. v. United States
No. 7332.
Invoices dated Sheffield, England, August 31, 1945, etc.
Entered at New York, N. Y., October 9, 1945, etc.
Entry No. 715222, etc.
(Decided July 11, 1947)
Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley 8. King of counsel) for the plaintiff.
Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Laweence, Judge:]
Laweence, Judge:
It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp., 33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.
Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the annexed schedule which is marked “A” and made a part of this decision, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar eases.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.