Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Emma Van Wert, Appellant, v. The St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Respondent
159 N.Y. 531·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emma Van Wert, Appellant, v. The St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Respondent.
Van Wert v. St. Paul F. & M. Ins. Co., 13 App. Div. 622, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted April 24, 1899;
decided May 2, 1899.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 19, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint, on trial at Circuit.
The motion ivas made upon the ground of the failure of appellant to file an undertaking on appeal.
William JD. Murray for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.