Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Anthony Eckert, Respondent, v. Freeman M. Vilas et al., Impleaded with Others, Appellants
162 N.Y. 662·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anthony Eckert, Respondent, v. Freeman M. Vilas et al., Impleaded with Others, Appellants.
Reported below, 29 App. Div. 627.
(Submitted April 23, 1900;
decided May 1, 1900.)
Motion to put on calendar and prefer an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 12, 1898, affirm-
ing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the Erie County Court decreeing the foreclosure and sale of certain premises.
The motion, was made upon the grounds that the appeal is without merit and taken solely for delay, and that unless it cap be heard and disposed of at once, there is great danger that the rights of the plaintiff will be irretrievably lost.
Morris Cohn, Jr., for motion.
Wheeler & Woodward opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, without costs, without prejudice to respondent’s right to move to dismiss appeal.