General
In the Matter of the Petition of Norbert Heinsheimer, an Attorney and Counselor at Law of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Respondent, to Enforce an Attorney's Lien upon and against the Judgment in the Action of Anton H. Meyer, as Assignee of the United States Restaurant and Realty Company, Appellant, v. David A. Schulte and Rose Schulte, Respondents, and Any Sum or Sums Paid or Payable Thereunder
158 A.D. 922·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1913·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Norbert Heinsheimer, an Attorney and Counselor at Law of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Respondent, to Enforce an Attorney’s Lien upon and against the Judgment in the Action of Anton H. Meyer, as Assignee of the United States Restaurant and Realty Company, Appellant, v. David A. Schulte and Rose Schulte, Respondents, and Any Sum or Sums Paid or Payable Thereunder.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.