General
Francisco Munoz v. Richard Surface Construction Company et al.
27 Conn. App. 906·Connecticut Appellate Court·1992·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Francisco Munoz v. Richard Surface Construction Company et al.
(9901)
Dupont, C. J., Norcott and Landau, Js.
Argued March 26
decision released April 14, 1992
Kevin J. Maher, with whom, on the brief, was Maureen E. Driscoll, for the appellant (named defendant et al.).
Christopher B. Carveth, for the appellee (plaintiff).
Robin L. Wilson, assistant attorney general, with whom were Robert W. Murphy, assistant attorney general, and, on the brief, Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Charles A. Overend, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (defendant Second Injury and Compensation Assurance Fund).
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed.