Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
53 F.2d 1087·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 4610.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Nov. 16, 1931.
Frederick H. Spotts and Layton M. Schoch, both of Philadelphia, Pa. (Pepper, Bodine, Stokes & Schoch, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellant.
E. W. Rhodes, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Philadelphia, Pa.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The above case having been called for argument, and the court being informed by counsel for the government that the appellee consented to a reversal of the judgment, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said District • Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed.