Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Emile R. Lattan et al., Appellants, v. Adeline Van Ness, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estates of Fanny A. Lattan and Angelica Lattan, Deceased, et al., Respondents
184 N.Y. 601·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emile R. Lattan et al., Appellants, v. Adeline Van Ness, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estates of Fanny A. Lattan and Angelica Lattan, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
Lattan v. Van Ness, 107 App. Div. 393, affirmed.
(Argued March 23, 1906;
decided April 6, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 31, 1905, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Reuben Leslie Maynard for appellants.
Benjamin F. Tracy and George Richards for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against plaintiffs on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., G-ray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.