Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
United States v. Tucker
404 U.S. 935·Supreme Court of the United States·1971
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 70-86.
United States v. Tucker.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 402 U. S. 942.] Motion to appoint co-counsel on behalf of respondent and for William A. Reppy, Jr., to present oral argument in this case granted. It is ordered that William A. Reppy, Jr., Esquire, of Durham, North Carolina, a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as co-counsel for respondent.