Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Securities
Sadie E. Crosby, Respondent, v. Security Mutual Life Insurance Company, Appellant
183 N.Y. 579·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sadie E. Crosby, Respondent, v. Security Mutual Life Insurance Company, Appellant.
(Argued January 11, 1906;
decided January 30, 1906.)
Crosby v. Security Mutual L. Ins. Co., 94 App. Div. 614, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment, entered J une 20, 1904, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, which affirmed an order of the court at a Trial Term, denying a motion for a new trial after a verdict in favor of plaintiff directed by the court.
Frank Rice, C. H. Bovee and F. W. Jenkins for appellant.
Henry E. Miller and Charles E. Opdyke for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur : Haight, Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, J.T. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J., and O’Brien, J. Not sitting: Hiscook, J.