In re WALKER

In re WALKER. (District Court, N. D. California, First Division. September 22, 1913.) No. 7,559. Bankruptcy (§ 413)—Discharge—Sufficiency of Objections. Amended specifications of objection to tbe discharge of a bankrupt held insufficient, and a demurrer thereto .sustained without leave to amend. [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Bankruptcy, Cent. Dig. §§ 712-718, 725, 727; Dee. Dig. § 413.] In the matter of John J. Walker, bankrupt. On demurrer to amended specifications of objection to discharge. Demurrer sustained. Chas. F. Craig and J. Early Craig, both of San Francisco, Cal., for bankrupt. Olin D. Berry, of San Francisco, Cal., for opposing creditors. For other oases see same topic & § number in Deo. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r IndexeB [MAJORITY — DOOLING, District Judge.] DOOLING, District Judge. The bankrupt having petitioned for his discharge, the Royal Investment Company has filed its objections to such discharge, to the specifications wherein the bankrupt demurs, the demurrer to a previous objection having been sustained. The court is inclined to the belief that this opposition is based more upon the character of the business conducted by the opponent than upon the false representations of the bankrupt. The schedule shows that the notes of opponent bear interest at 10 per cent, per month. In such case the court will not go out of its way to assist opponent in keeping alive such a usurious contract. The specifications herein are insufficient, and, as opponent has already been allowed once to amend, the demurrer thereto will be sustained, without leave to amend.