Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
TURNER v. WRIGHT, TREASURER OF ILLINOIS, et al.
355 U.S. 65·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
TURNER v. WRIGHT, TREASURER OF ILLINOIS, et al.
No. 405.
Decided November 18, 1957.
Amos M. Matthews for appellant in No. 405.
Melvin B. Lewis for appellants in No. 470.
E. H. McDermott and Richard S. Oldberg for appellant in No. 482.
Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, and Mark O. Roberts, Lee D. Martin and Willard Ice, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees in Nos. 405 and 482.
John C. Melaniphy and Sydney R. Drebin for appellee in No. 470.
Together with No. 470, Abbate Brothers, Inc., et al. v. City of Chicago, and No. 482, Burgess-Norton Manufacturing Co. v. Lyons et al., also on appeals from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.