Contracts · MBE-tested

GARVIN v. COCHRAN, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

371 U.S. 279 L. Ed. 2d 4·Supreme Court of the United States·1962

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

GARVIN v. COCHRAN, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. No. 13, Misc., and No. 24, Misc. Decided October 15, 1962. Petitioner pro se. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. In view of the representations of the Attorney General of Florida that these actions for habeas corpus have become moot by reason of the death of the petitioner, the judgments of the Supreme Court of Florida are vacated and the causes are remanded for such proceedings as that court may deem appropriate. Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.