General
State of Connecticut v. Augustus J. Simmons
13 Conn. App. 804·Connecticut Appellate Court·1987·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
State of Connecticut v. Augustus J. Simmons
(5578)
Daly, Norcott and Foti, Js.
Argued December 8 —
decision released December 13, 1987
Augustus J. Simmons, pro se, the appellant (defendant).
Geoffrey Marion, deputy assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, was James G. Clark, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
After a plenary examination of the record, transcripts and briefs filed in this matter, and after having afforded those claims of error, which are properly before this court, the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that there is no merit to the defendant’s averments of error.
There is no error.