Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Southern Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mary L. Beach, Administratrix, etc.
193 U.S. 667·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Mr. F. H. Busbee, Mr: W. A. Henderson and Mr. Charles Price for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. .
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 191.
Southern Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mary L. Beach, Administratrix, etc.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina.
Submitted March 18, 1904.
Decided March 21, 1904.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed with costs, on the authority of Southern Railway Company v. Allison, 190 U. S. 326, and cause remanded for further proceedings.
Mr. F. H. Busbee, Mr: W. A. Henderson and Mr. Charles Price for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. .