General
Floral Trade Council, plaintiff v. United States, defendant, and Visaflor, S.A., Rancho Daisy, Rancho Guacatay, and Rancho Mision el Descanso, defendant-intervenors
17 Ct. Int'l Trade 915·United States Court of International Trade·1993
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Floral Trade Council, plaintiff v. United States, defendant, and Visaflor, S.A., Rancho Daisy, Rancho Guacatay, and Rancho Mision el Descanso, defendant-intervenors
Court No. 92-06-00393
(Dated August 16, 1993)
[MAJORITY — Restani, Judge:]
JUDGMENT
Restani, Judge:
This case having been submitted for decision and the Court, after deliberation, having rendered a decision therein; now, in conformity with that decision,
It is hereby ordered : that a remand determination having been issued finding the “all other” rate to be 18.20%, and no objections having been filed, it is hereby
Further ordered that the ITA’s remand determination is sustained and that an 18.20% rate shall be applied as the cash deposit “all other” rate for future entries.