General
William B. Slocum, Appellant, v. Catherine Domol et al., Respondents; Same Appellant v. William C. Veghts, Administrator, etc., Respondent
117 N.Y. 647·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William B. Slocum, Appellant, v. Catherine Domol et al., Respondents. Same Appellant v. William C. Veghts, Administrator, etc., Respondent.
(Argued November 25, 1889;
decided December 3, 1889.)
Motion to dismiss appeals from judgments in favor of defendants for failure to give the undertaking required by the statute of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made July 25, 1888.
A. & A. X. Fallon for motion.
William B. Slocum opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeals dismissed.