General
Conrad Belloff et al., Appellants, v. The Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh, Respondent
191 N.Y. 551·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Conrad Belloff et al., Appellants, v. The Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh, Respondent.
Beiloff v. Dime Sailings Bank of Williamsburgh, 118 App. Div. 20, affirmed.
(Argued March 10, 1908;
decided March 31, 1908.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 22, 1907, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover money alleged to have been paid through fraud and mistake.
James Troy and Thomas H. Troy for appellants.
Otto F. Struse for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellants on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.