Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Mrs. Nettle NASH et al., Appellants, v. R. P. DOROUGH, Trustee, Appellee
43 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mrs. Nettle NASH et al., Appellants, v. R. P. DOROUGH, Trustee, Appellee.
No. 6020.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 24, 1930.
J. Q. Mahaffey and C. E. Bryson, both of Texarkana, Tex. (H. A. O’Neal and Ben A. Harper, both of Atlanta, Tex., and John J. King and J. I. Wheeler, both of Texarkana, Tex., on the brief), for appellants.
Elmer L. Lincoln and S. I. Robison, both of Texarkana, Tex., for appellee.
Before BRYAN and POSTER, Circuit Judges, and DA W KINS, District Judge.
Rehearing denied December 19, 1930.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The decree is affirmed.